QUESTION: The paper focuses mainly on the BENEFITS of moving innovations from the InsideOut. What do you think would be the possible downside to this move? Can we think of any examples?
+20
Baptiste Marchis
Andrew_Sharkey
Anders_Schmidt
Gene_Simpson
kathia Morano
Mariya_Dadiomova
Florent_Blanchard
Anais_Grelet
BartekWu
shirleyo
julie
soraya_berdeil
Naomi_Karnovsky
edith_bonnefond
Brodie
Edghill_Manuel
Janick_Edinger
jeremie_francois
florent_lefevre
lawrence_lo
24 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: QUESTION: The paper focuses mainly on the BENEFITS of moving innovations from the InsideOut. What do you think would be the possible downside to this move? Can we think of any examples?
Great point Anders, the company has to make the right decision of what they are putting out. They should not even think about putting out their core activities out for grabs. Because when the success scenario starts to kick in, like anders said, they it is when the war start to begin on intellectual property. Another disadvantage would be if the company gave their core activities were to be mistakenly take outside, the firm would lose to the business partner newly turned competitor. However, with the world's economic state at the moment, definitely open innovation would have a great impact!
uroi.salii- Posts : 26
Join date : 2009-09-17
Re: QUESTION: The paper focuses mainly on the BENEFITS of moving innovations from the InsideOut. What do you think would be the possible downside to this move? Can we think of any examples?
I agree about the core competences. A company should have at least one outstanding core competence, a unique ability. This will be the main focus for the entire firm. But still, companies can have very different core competences. For one company, there might be a certain core technology, others have established an infastructure for rapid innovations and prototyping. Not to forget companies, whose core competence is to manage outside resources. If you consider THAT to be your core competence, moving innovations inside out can be a good idea. Otherwise, if you know you lack that ability, don't even think about it. Plus I would suggest it depends heavily on the industry your company is active in.
tobias_off- Posts : 17
Join date : 2009-09-21
Re: QUESTION: The paper focuses mainly on the BENEFITS of moving innovations from the InsideOut. What do you think would be the possible downside to this move? Can we think of any examples?
Companies should be careful when selecting which 3rd party company to cooperate with. Factors to consider may include: relationship with competitors, credibility, experience, cost, to name a few. Personally I think their relationship with competitors is the most important factor. If a wrong partner is choosen the project might be delayed, poorly marketed, or even passed on to competitors.
Ted_Chiang- Posts : 14
Join date : 2009-10-01
Age : 42
Location : Taipei, Taiwan
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Question 1: Examples
» [Question 3] Service-logic innovations cases
» QUESTION: Real-life examples for inside-out open innovation?
» QUESTION: Choosing a Move
» QUESTION: Example of Move#5 In Online Games
» [Question 3] Service-logic innovations cases
» QUESTION: Real-life examples for inside-out open innovation?
» QUESTION: Choosing a Move
» QUESTION: Example of Move#5 In Online Games
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum